Key Points

- Research has focused on addressing memory inefficiencies in Large Language Models (LLMs) through strategies such as rematerialization, One Forward pass followed by One Backward pass (1F1B), balancing memory usage throughout the pipeline, and addressing the challenge of training large models with extensive sequence lengths.

- Automated Parallelism, including 3D parallelism, aims to optimize performance by distributing training data uniformly across workers, manually partitioning the model, and distributing layers in each pipeline stage. However, manual orchestration of parallelism types is complex and not easily adaptable across different models and computing environments.

- Strategies for memory optimization in training LLMs include ZeRO, ZeRO offload, and DeepSpeed, which offer different levels of memory optimization by partitioning optimizer states, gradients, and model parameters across GPUs, and extending memory optimization beyond GPU to utilize CPU and NVMe memory to enable training of extremely large models.

- Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods focus on refining LLMs by adjusting a small number of trainable parameters while leaving most or all of the original pretrained parameters fixed. Techniques include partial parameter tuning, model-adapter tuning, and parameter-adapter tuning, each aimed at enhancing memory and computational efficiency in adapting LLMs to specific tasks.

- Data-Efficient Tuning, particularly prompt tuning, focuses on modifying the tunable template embedding to improve performance in downstream tasks and enable LLMs to engage in few-shot or zero-shot learning, especially useful in scenarios with limited supervised data, by generating new prompt templates.

- Pruning, knowledge distillation, quantization, and low-rank decomposition are common techniques for compacting LLM models to reach competitive performance to the full model with reduced computational demands, each with their respective methods and considerations for optimal implementation.

Summary

Introduction and Overview
The survey on efficient large language models (LLMs) highlights the challenges presented by their increasing size and computational demands. It emphasizes the importance of algorithmic advancements to enhance LLM efficiency and comprehensively covers various topics related to scaling laws, data utilization, architectural designs, training and tuning strategies, and inference techniques. The survey discusses the capabilities and drawbacks of LLMs, emphasizing their impressive performance but also the limitations imposed by high computational costs and memory requirements. It highlights the impact on resource allocation, model design, and deployment limitations, especially in resource-constrained environments.

Techniques for Efficient LLMs
The survey covers various techniques for improving LLM efficiency, including advancements in algorithmic training stability strategies, mixed precision training, and parallelism-based techniques such as data parallelism, model parallelism with tensor parallelism and pipeline parallelism. The overview discusses the importance of innovative training and tuning strategies, focusing on aspects such as memory, computation, and communication efficiency, as well as the challenges presented by training instability.

Additionally, the survey delves into the architecture of LLMs, particularly the transformer model, emphasizing the challenges related to attention computation and the need for efficient attention mechanisms. It explores advancements such as fast attention calculation, hardware-related efficient attention, innovative positional encoding strategies, and the integration of sparse modeling methods. Furthermore, the survey highlights important insights into strategies for enhancing data efficiency, covering techniques such as data filtering, deduplication, data undersampling, active learning, and diversity sampling.

Scaling Laws and Data Quality
The survey also discusses scaling laws for LLMs, including how models evolve and perform under varying conditions, with insights into compute-optimal models and scaling law for transfer learning. It addresses the impact of data quality on model performance and the implications for efficiency improvement.

Overall, the survey provides a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of efficient large language models, aiming to serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners. It gives a detailed overview of algorithmic advancements and techniques that contribute to the development of efficient LLMs, covering a wide array of aspects essential for the end-to-end algorithmic development of LLMs.

Comprehensive Survey of Algorithmic Innovations
The research paper provides a comprehensive survey of algorithmic innovations aimed at improving the efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs). It covers various aspects such as architecture efficiency, training, tuning efficiency, and inference efficiency. The paper discusses strategies and techniques for improving LLM efficiency, including automated parallelism, memory optimization, and techniques for efficient adaptation of pretrained LLMs for specific applications. The survey also delves into the challenges posed by computational demands, memory requirements, and the evolving landscape of LLMs.

Through a detailed analysis of different approaches such as rematerialization, PipeDream, BPipe, TeraPipe, and automated parallelism methods, the paper aims to provide valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in the field. It discusses the challenges and strategies related to memory optimization, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, and data-efficient tuning. The paper also explores methods like knowledge distillation, quantization, and low-rank decomposition to enhance the efficiency of LLMs, with a focus on specific techniques for reducing redundancy and improving inference speed. One of the key contributions of the paper is its comprehensive overview of algorithmic developments in the field of LLMs and the potential for future breakthroughs and innovation in LLM efficiency.

Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00678