Key Points

1. The paper introduces Online AI Feedback (OAIF) as a method to improve the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human expectations and values.


2. OAIF leverages an LLM as an annotator, allowing for online feedback to be collected on-the-fly for responses generated by the LLM being aligned.


3. The study highlights the limitations of offline preference datasets in Direct Alignment from Preference (DAP) methods and demonstrates the effectiveness of OAIF in comparison to offline methods.


4. OAIF is shown to outperform offline DAP and RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) methods in various tasks as evaluated through human and AI feedback.


5. The paper also discusses the controllability of the LLM annotator by injecting specific instructions into the prompts, demonstrating that the feedback leveraged in OAIF is easily controllable.


6. The effectiveness of OAIF is further demonstrated through extensive empirical comparisons with existing offline DAP and RLHF methods, confirming the generality and utility of OAIF in making DAP methods online and on-policy.


7. The method bridges the gap between DAP methods that do not require a separate reward model and RLHF methods that interact online with the LLM being aligned, by making DAP methods online and leveraging online feedback.


8. The paper also investigates the impact of the size of the LLM annotator on the performance of OAIF and confirms that even feedback from a smaller annotator can be beneficial in improving alignment.


9. The study concludes by indicating the potential for OAIF to address challenges in reinforcement learning from human preferences and mitigating safety risks in alignment of LLMs.

Summary

Introduction and Background
The paper proposes a method called Online AI Feedback (OAIF) to improve the alignment of language models with human preferences. OAIF leverages a language model as an annotator to provide online feedback, addressing the limitations of purely offline methods. The study demonstrates that OAIF outperforms offline Direct Alignment from Preferences (DAP) methods, as well as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) methods. The paper shows that feedback leveraged in OAIF is easily controllable via instruction prompts to the language model annotator.

The study compares the effectiveness and generality of OAIF for turning offline DAP methods into online methods and demonstrates the controllability of the language model annotator by injecting specific instructions into the prompts. The results show the superiority of OAIF in improving the alignment of language models and address the limitations of purely offline DAP methods. The study provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of OAIF, demonstrating its potential for more scalable alignment strategies with reduced human effort.

The proposed method, OAIF, offers a simple and effective way to make DAP methods online via AI feedback, showing promise in improving the alignment of AI with human expectations and values. The approach is shown to be effective for various DAP methods and is demonstrated to be compatible with differentiable loss functions. The paper acknowledges the potential for future work in extending the method to address challenges in reinforcement learning from human feedback and mitigate safety risks in AI alignment.


Empirical Evidence and Potential

The study provides extensive empirical evidence of the effectiveness of OAIF and its potential for more scalable alignment strategies requiring reduced human effort. The method offers a promising approach to improving the alignment of language models with human expectations and values.

Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.047...